JPMorgan — sell-side record
JPMorgan made 278 rating actions across 86 covered names in the last 12 months, 64% of them Buy-type and 7% Sell-type. Of its 405 price targets that resolved, 149 (37%) were reached while they stood, 251 were replaced by JPMorgan before their deadline and 5 fell short at it. 34 of its 60 Buy- and Sell-type ratings that ran a full horizon agreed with how the stock did against its sector.
93 covered names with a call from JPMorgan in the last two years, checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.
What its Holds say: JPMorgan's 80 Hold-type ratings in the last 12 months carried a median price target +7% from the price on the day; 21% sat below the price. Of its Holds that ran a full horizon, 1 of 18 stayed within 5 points of the sector ETF.
By name
| Ticker | Rating actions, 12 mo | Targets reached | Replaced early | Short | Resolved | Ratings vs sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 5 | 3 (25%) | 9 | 0 | 12 | 0 of 1 |
| ZS | 5 | 4 (36%) | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 of 1 |
| AMZN | 4 | 0 (0%) | 11 | 0 | 11 | 1 of 1 |
| GEV | 3 | 6 (60%) | 4 | 0 | 10 | 1 of 1 |
| COST | 6 | 2 (22%) | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 of 1 |
| MS | 5 | 5 (56%) | 4 | 0 | 9 | — |
| UNH | 5 | 1 (11%) | 8 | 0 | 9 | 0 of 1 |
| MGM | 7 | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 | 8 | — |
| DKNG | 6 | 1 (12%) | 7 | 0 | 8 | 0 of 1 |
| ENPH | 6 | 4 (50%) | 4 | 0 | 8 | — |
| FTNT | 6 | 4 (50%) | 4 | 0 | 8 | — |
| TER | 3 | 5 (62%) | 3 | 0 | 8 | — |
| BA | 5 | 2 (29%) | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| CZR | 4 | 0 (0%) | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| NXT | 4 | 5 (71%) | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| SEDG | 3 | 4 (57%) | 3 | 0 | 7 | — |
| LEU | 6 | 3 (50%) | 3 | 0 | 6 | — |
| WFC | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 0 | 6 | — |
| ASML | 5 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| GS | 5 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 0 | 6 | — |
| PANW | 5 | 4 (67%) | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 of 1 |
| TSLA | 5 | 0 (0%) | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 of 1 |
| AVGO | 4 | 3 (50%) | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| NVDA | 4 | 1 (17%) | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| AMD | 3 | 5 (83%) | 1 | 0 | 6 | — |
| GOOGL | 3 | 3 (50%) | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| GILD | 2 | 1 (17%) | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| ORCL | 2 | 3 (50%) | 3 | 0 | 6 | — |
| RUN | 2 | 0 (0%) | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| UBER | 2 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 of 1 |
| BAC | 5 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| FITB | 5 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| LNG | 5 | 1 (20%) | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| LLY | 4 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| PENN | 4 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| REGN | 3 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| WMT | 3 | 1 (20%) | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| CEG | 2 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| FSLR | 2 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| OXY | 2 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | — |
| SLB | 2 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| USB | 7 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| PNC | 6 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| META | 5 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0 | 4 | — |
| ABBV | 3 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| AMAT | 3 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| CME | 3 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| HOOD | 3 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | — |
| INTC | 3 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| ROK | 3 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 0 | 4 | — |
| VST | 3 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| AR | 2 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0 | 4 | — |
| LRCX | 2 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| SCHW | 2 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| EQT | 1 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| HD | 1 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| VRTX | 0 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| KEY | 4 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | — |
| NFLX | 4 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0 | 3 | — |
| BKR | 2 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| DIS | 2 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 of 1 |
| SHOP | 2 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 of 1 |
| SYK | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| MSFT | 1 | 1 (33%) | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 of 1 |
| TLN | 1 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| XOM | 1 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| KMI | 0 | 1 (33%) | 2 | 0 | 3 | — |
| TFC | 6 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| MRK | 3 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
| COP | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| HAL | 2 | 1 (50%) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 of 1 |
| ISRG | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| PFE | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| V | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| ICE | 1 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 of 1 |
| MA | 1 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| MRNA | 1 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 of 1 |
| NET | 0 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
| NOV | 0 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
| CRWD | 4 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 of 1 |
| ABT | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| BWXT | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| FLUT | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| JNJ | 2 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| BSX | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| EOG | 0 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| EXE | 0 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| FTI | 0 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 of 1 |
| KLAC | 3 | — | — | — | 0 | 1 of 1 |
| MDT | 2 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| SPCX | 2 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| IONQ | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| OKLO | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
Per-name counts are small; no percentage on one name is a measure of skill.
Latest calls
| Date | Ticker | Rating | Action | Price at call | Target | Target status | Move in the 30 days before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | HOOD | Neutral | maintained | $91.43 | $114 | running to 2027-10-28 | -21.5% |
| 2026-10-28 | ENPH | Neutral | maintained | $24.99 | $29 | running to 2027-10-28 | -19.1% |
| 2026-10-28 | V | Overweight | maintained | $400.60 | $455 | running to 2027-10-28 | +8.9% |
| 2026-10-28 | BA | Overweight | maintained | $167.14 | $240 | running to 2027-10-28 | -9.4% |
| 2026-10-26 | LEU | Neutral | maintained | $98.44 | $120 | running to 2027-10-26 | -33.1% |
| 2026-10-23 | FTNT | Underweight | maintained | $179.99 | $140 | reached 2026-10-29 | +0.7% |
| 2026-10-23 | LNG | Overweight | maintained | $298.67 | $344 | running to 2027-10-23 | +9.2% |
| 2026-10-22 | CME | Underweight → Overweight | upgrade | $305.98 | $367 | running to 2027-10-22 | +14.5% |
| 2026-10-22 | ABT | Overweight | maintained | $102.51 | $118 | running to 2027-10-22 | -1.1% |
| 2026-10-22 | TSLA | Neutral | maintained | $374.58 | $430 | running to 2027-10-22 | -1.1% |
Other firms: Barclays · Wells Fargo · Morgan Stanley · UBS · Citigroup · RBC Capital · Truist Securities · TD Cowen · Cantor Fitzgerald · Evercore ISI Group · Piper Sandler · Needham. All firms.
How calls are checked
Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →
Get the daily brief
Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.