Scorecard › Firms › Mizuho

Mizuho — sell-side record

Mizuho made 182 rating actions across 54 covered names in the last 12 months, 75% of them Buy-type and 3% Sell-type. Of its 299 price targets that resolved, 99 (33%) were reached while they stood, 198 were replaced by Mizuho before their deadline and 2 fell short at it. 14 of its 32 Buy- and Sell-type ratings that ran a full horizon agreed with how the stock did against its sector.

59 covered names with a call from Mizuho in the last two years, checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.

Targets reached while they stood
33.1% 99 of 299
95% range 28–39%
Replaced by Mizuho before the deadline
66.2% 198
Short at the deadline
0.7% 2
Still running
42
Ratings vs sector
14 of 32
95% range 28–61% · no letter
Ratings: Buy / Hold / Sell, 12 mo
75 / 21 / 3%
182 rating actions

What its Holds say: Mizuho's 37 Hold-type ratings in the last 12 months carried a median price target +8% from the price on the day; 24% sat below the price. Of its Holds that ran a full horizon, 1 of 11 stayed within 5 points of the sector ETF.

Mizuho's own rating definitions are not on file yet. Its calls are checked on the defaults: a 12-month horizon, and the stock's sector SPDR ETF as the benchmark. If Mizuho publishes a different horizon or benchmark, the record will be rechecked on those terms.

By name

TickerRating actions, 12 moTargets reachedReplaced earlyShortResolvedRatings vs sector
AMD7 9 (53%) 8017 1 of 1
AVGO4 5 (38%) 8013 1 of 1
LRCX6 5 (42%) 7012 1 of 1
TSLA5 4 (33%) 8012 0 of 1
AMAT8 3 (27%) 8011 —
HOOD7 4 (36%) 7011 1 of 1
ZS8 4 (40%) 6010 —
NET5 7 (70%) 3010 1 of 1
NVDA3 0 (0%) 10010 1 of 1
PLTR5 1 (11%) 809 —
UNH5 2 (22%) 709 0 of 1
COP4 2 (22%) 709 0 of 1
OXY3 0 (0%) 909 0 of 1
FTNT6 2 (25%) 608 1 of 1
EOG5 3 (38%) 508 —
CVX4 1 (12%) 708 0 of 1
MSFT4 2 (29%) 507 0 of 1
XOM4 2 (29%) 507 —
AMZN4 0 (0%) 606 0 of 1
EXE2 0 (0%) 516 1 of 1
FSLR2 2 (33%) 406 1 of 1
NXT4 2 (40%) 305 —
AR3 2 (40%) 305 0 of 1
DKNG3 0 (0%) 505 0 of 1
WMT3 3 (60%) 205 1 of 1
HD2 0 (0%) 505 0 of 1
MGM1 0 (0%) 505 0 of 1
ORCL1 3 (60%) 205 0 of 1
INTC5 3 (75%) 104 —
PANW4 3 (75%) 104 —
GOOGL3 2 (50%) 204 1 of 1
PENN3 0 (0%) 404 0 of 1
EQT2 2 (50%) 204 1 of 1
ENPH1 0 (0%) 404 —
ISRG4 1 (33%) 203 —
QBTS4 1 (33%) 203 —
RGTI3 1 (33%) 203 —
MDT2 1 (33%) 203 0 of 1
SEDG1 3 (100%) 003 —
CRWD7 1 (50%) 102 —
BSX3 0 (0%) 202 —
CEG3 2 (100%) 002 —
COST3 1 (50%) 102 —
KMI3 1 (50%) 102 —
GEV1 1 (50%) 102 —
RUN1 1 (50%) 102 1 of 1
SHOP1 2 (100%) 002 —
ABT0 1 (50%) 102 —
GILD0 2 (100%) 002 1 of 1
LNG0 1 (50%) 102 0 of 1
V0 1 (50%) 012 0 of 1
AMGN2 0 (0%) 101 —
META2 0 (0%) 101 —
UBER1 0 (0%) 101 0 of 1
ROK2 — ——0 —
IONQ1 — ——0 —
TLN1 — ——0 —
VST1 — ——0 —
MA0 — ——0 0 of 1

Per-name counts are small; no percentage on one name is a measure of skill.

Latest calls

DateTickerRatingActionPrice at callTargetTarget statusMove in the 30 days before
2026-10-22 LRCX Outperform maintained $230.15 $360 running to 2027-10-22 -26.0%
2026-10-22 CRWD Outperform maintained $237.94 $275 running to 2027-10-22 -4.8%
2026-10-22 KMI Outperform maintained $33.72 $39 running to 2027-10-22 +7.8%
2026-10-22 TSLA Outperform maintained $374.58 $460 running to 2027-10-22 -1.1%
2026-10-22 META Outperform maintained $648.85 $950 running to 2027-10-22 -11.9%
2026-10-22 UNH Outperform maintained $424.98 $500 running to 2027-10-22 +13.9%
2026-10-21 ISRG Neutral maintained $428.12 $400 running to 2027-10-21 +6.6%
2026-10-15 FTNT Underperform maintained $181.91 $160 reached 2026-10-29 +5.5%
2026-10-15 EQT Outperform maintained $52.45 $68 running to 2027-10-15 -1.3%
2026-10-15 NXT Neutral maintained $83.45 $101 running to 2027-10-15 +4.6%

Other firms: Barclays · Wells Fargo · Morgan Stanley · UBS · Citigroup · RBC Capital · JPMorgan · Truist Securities · TD Cowen · Cantor Fitzgerald · Evercore ISI Group · Piper Sandler. All firms.

How calls are checked

Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →

Get the daily brief

Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.