How the Street's calls on robotics & physical ai played out
Sell-side price targets on robotics & physical ai names over the last two years, checked over each firm's own horizon: 105 of 267 resolved targets (39%) were reached while they stood, 152 were replaced by the same firm first, and 10 fell short at their deadline.
3 names · 18 firms with 8+ resolved targets here · checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.
Firm by firm on robotics & physical ai
| # | Firm | Targets reached | Replaced early | Short | Resolved | Ratings vs sector | Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays | 9 (38%) | 15 | 0 | 24 | 2 of 2 | ROK SYM TSLA | |
| Wedbush | 2 (9%) | 18 | 2 | 22 | 1 of 1 | TSLA | |
| Cantor Fitzgerald | 6 (35%) | 11 | 0 | 17 | 2 of 2 | SYM TSLA | |
| Mizuho | 4 (33%) | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 of 1 | ROK TSLA | |
| UBS | 4 (33%) | 7 | 1 | 12 | 1 of 2 | ROK SYM TSLA | |
| Morgan Stanley | 6 (54%) | 5 | 0 | 11 | 1 of 1 | ROK TSLA | |
| Canaccord Genuity | 2 (18%) | 9 | 0 | 11 | 1 of 1 | TSLA | |
| Citigroup | 4 (36%) | 7 | 0 | 11 | 2 of 2 | ROK SYM | |
| JPMorgan | 2 (20%) | 8 | 0 | 10 | 0 of 1 | ROK TSLA | |
| Baird | 5 (50%) | 5 | 0 | 10 | 1 of 2 | ROK SYM TSLA | |
| Truist Securities | 5 (56%) | 4 | 0 | 9 | — | TSLA | |
| Goldman Sachs | 6 (67%) | 3 | 0 | 9 | — | ROK SYM TSLA | |
| Needham | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 | SYM TSLA | |
| RBC Capital | 1 (12%) | 7 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 | TSLA | |
| Piper Sandler | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 | TSLA | |
| Bank of America | 4 (50%) | 4 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 | ROK TSLA | |
| KeyBanc | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 | ROK SYM | |
| Guggenheim | 0 (0%) | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 of 1 | TSLA |
Numbered firms have 30+ resolved targets in this sector and are ordered by the share reached; the rest are listed by volume, unranked. A record inside one sector is a slice of a slice: none of these counts is a measure of skill, and none carries a letter. How targets and ratings are checked →
The names
Other sectors
How calls are checked
Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →
Get the calls before they're checked
Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.