Guggenheim — sell-side record
Guggenheim made 120 rating actions across 29 covered names in the last 12 months, 88% of them Buy-type and 2% Sell-type. Of its 151 price targets that resolved, 45 (30%) were reached while they stood, 99 were replaced by Guggenheim before their deadline and 7 fell short at it. 11 of its 23 Buy- and Sell-type ratings that ran a full horizon agreed with how the stock did against its sector.
35 covered names with a call from Guggenheim in the last two years, checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.
What its Holds say: Guggenheim's 6 Hold-type ratings in the last 12 months carried a median price target -6% from the price on the day; 83% sat below the price. Of its Holds that ran a full horizon, 1 of 4 stayed within 5 points of the sector ETF.
By name
| Ticker | Rating actions, 12 mo | Targets reached | Replaced early | Short | Resolved | Ratings vs sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | 7 | 6 (46%) | 7 | 0 | 13 | 1 of 1 |
| ABBV | 5 | 5 (56%) | 4 | 0 | 9 | 1 of 1 |
| FSLR | 4 | 2 (22%) | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 of 1 |
| ORCL | 5 | 1 (12%) | 6 | 1 | 8 | 0 of 1 |
| WMT | 4 | 2 (25%) | 6 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 |
| TSLA | 0 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 of 1 |
| NFLX | 8 | 1 (14%) | 6 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| DIS | 6 | 1 (14%) | 6 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| DKNG | 6 | 0 (0%) | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| MRK | 4 | 3 (43%) | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| GEV | 3 | 5 (71%) | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| JNJ | 6 | 3 (50%) | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| MSFT | 6 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0 of 1 |
| REGN | 5 | 0 (0%) | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 of 1 |
| ZS | 6 | 5 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 5 | — |
| PFE | 4 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| NET | 3 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| META | 6 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | — |
| PANW | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 1 | 4 | — |
| UBER | 6 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 of 1 |
| GOOGL | 3 | 3 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| NXT | 1 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | — |
| AMGN | 6 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| HD | 4 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| AMZN | 3 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 | — |
| NRG | 0 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 of 1 |
| ENPH | 0 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 of 1 |
| SEDG | 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| VRTX | 0 | 0 (0%) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| BWXT | 2 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| CRWD | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| LEU | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| OKLO | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| RUN | 1 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| FTNT | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
Per-name counts are small; no percentage on one name is a measure of skill.
Latest calls
| Date | Ticker | Rating | Action | Price at call | Target | Target status | Move in the 30 days before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-29 | MSFT | Buy | maintained | $528.80 | $595 | running to 2027-10-29 | +3.9% |
| 2026-10-29 | GOOGL | Buy | reiterated | $282.94 | $450 | running to 2027-10-29 | -17.0% |
| 2026-10-27 | FSLR | Buy | maintained | $175.85 | $299 | running to 2027-10-27 | -1.1% |
| 2026-10-22 | META | Buy | reiterated | $648.85 | $850 | running to 2027-10-22 | -11.9% |
| 2026-10-21 | MSFT | Buy | reiterated | $532.95 | $586 | replaced 2026-10-29, new $595 | +6.2% |
| 2026-10-21 | NFLX | Buy | maintained | $65.04 | $78 | running to 2027-10-21 | -11.3% |
| 2026-10-16 | UBER | Buy | reiterated | $70.35 | $125 | running to 2027-10-16 | -0.9% |
| 2026-10-14 | META | Buy | maintained | $737.54 | $850 | running to 2027-10-14 | +10.8% |
| 2026-10-13 | GEV | Buy | reiterated | $1004.04 | $1450 | running to 2027-10-13 | +4.9% |
| 2026-10-13 | AMGN | Neutral | maintained | $412.84 | $378 | running to 2027-10-13 | +9.4% |
Other firms: Barclays · Wells Fargo · Morgan Stanley · UBS · Citigroup · RBC Capital · JPMorgan · Truist Securities · TD Cowen · Cantor Fitzgerald · Evercore ISI Group · Piper Sandler. All firms.
How calls are checked
Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →
Get the daily brief
Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.