How the Street's calls on nat gas & lng played out
Sell-side price targets on nat gas & lng names over the last two years, checked over each firm's own horizon: 83 of 316 resolved targets (26%) were reached while they stood, 218 were replaced by the same firm first, and 15 fell short at their deadline.
5 names · 15 firms with 8+ resolved targets here · checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.
Firm by firm on nat gas & lng
| # | Firm | Targets reached | Replaced early | Short | Resolved | Ratings vs sector | Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barclays | 6 (19%) | 26 | 0 | 32 | 0 of 4 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG |
| 2 | UBS | 5 (10%) | 41 | 2 | 48 | 3 of 5 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG |
| Morgan Stanley | 3 (12%) | 22 | 0 | 25 | 0 of 2 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Scotiabank | 5 (24%) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 0 of 3 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Wells Fargo | 8 (38%) | 13 | 0 | 21 | 1 of 3 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Mizuho | 6 (32%) | 12 | 1 | 19 | 2 of 4 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| JPMorgan | 6 (35%) | 11 | 0 | 17 | 1 of 3 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Piper Sandler | 2 (12%) | 14 | 0 | 16 | 0 of 1 | EQT EXE | |
| Jefferies | 4 (27%) | 11 | 0 | 15 | 1 of 4 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Truist Securities | 1 (8%) | 11 | 1 | 13 | 0 of 1 | AR EQT EXE KMI | |
| Citigroup | 6 (50%) | 5 | 1 | 12 | 2 of 3 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Stephens & Co. | 2 (17%) | 10 | 0 | 12 | 0 of 2 | EQT EXE | |
| Bank of America | 2 (22%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 0 of 3 | AR EQT LNG | |
| TD Cowen | 4 (50%) | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 of 4 | AR EQT EXE KMI LNG | |
| Raymond James | 1 (12%) | 6 | 1 | 8 | 1 of 3 | AR EXE LNG |
Numbered firms have 30+ resolved targets in this sector and are ordered by the share reached; the rest are listed by volume, unranked. A record inside one sector is a slice of a slice: none of these counts is a measure of skill, and none carries a letter. How targets and ratings are checked →
The names
Other sectors
How calls are checked
Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →
Get the calls before they're checked
Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.