Susquehanna — sell-side record
Susquehanna made 132 rating actions across 40 covered names in the last 12 months, 80% of them Buy-type and 0% Sell-type. Of its 203 price targets that resolved, 71 (35%) were reached while they stood, 126 were replaced by Susquehanna before their deadline and 6 fell short at it. 20 of its 33 Buy- and Sell-type ratings that ran a full horizon agreed with how the stock did against its sector.
43 covered names with a call from Susquehanna in the last two years, checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.
What its Holds say: Susquehanna's 25 Hold-type ratings in the last 12 months carried a median price target +5% from the price on the day; 16% sat below the price. Of its Holds that ran a full horizon, 1 of 7 stayed within 5 points of the sector ETF.
By name
| Ticker | Rating actions, 12 mo | Targets reached | Replaced early | Short | Resolved | Ratings vs sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKR | 7 | 1 (9%) | 10 | 0 | 11 | 1 of 1 |
| NXT | 7 | 5 (50%) | 5 | 0 | 10 | 1 of 1 |
| GEV | 5 | 4 (40%) | 6 | 0 | 10 | 1 of 1 |
| SLB | 6 | 1 (11%) | 8 | 0 | 9 | 1 of 1 |
| FTI | 6 | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 of 1 |
| COP | 4 | 1 (12%) | 7 | 0 | 8 | 0 of 1 |
| HAL | 4 | 2 (25%) | 6 | 0 | 8 | 0 of 1 |
| AMD | 5 | 4 (57%) | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| NOV | 5 | 2 (29%) | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| OXY | 5 | 2 (29%) | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| DKNG | 4 | 0 (0%) | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| RUN | 4 | 3 (43%) | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| SEDG | 4 | 6 (86%) | 1 | 0 | 7 | — |
| FSLR | 3 | 3 (43%) | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 of 1 |
| BA | 2 | 0 (0%) | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1 of 1 |
| ENPH | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 0 | 6 | — |
| EOG | 3 | 0 (0%) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| PENN | 3 | 1 (20%) | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 of 1 |
| TER | 2 | 3 (60%) | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| TSM | 2 | 2 (40%) | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| V | 2 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 of 1 |
| INTC | 4 | 4 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 4 | — |
| AMAT | 3 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | — |
| CZR | 3 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | — |
| LRCX | 3 | 3 (75%) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| AVGO | 2 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 of 1 |
| FLUT | 2 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| PANW | 2 | 2 (50%) | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 of 1 |
| GOOGL | 2 | 1 (33%) | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| MGM | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| NVDA | 2 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| AMZN | 1 | 3 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 of 1 |
| ZS | 0 | 1 (33%) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 of 1 |
| MA | 1 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 of 1 |
| ASML | 0 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 of 1 |
| KLAC | 3 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| SPCX | 3 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| META | 2 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| UBER | 1 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| AAPL | 0 | 1 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 of 1 |
| NET | 3 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| CRWD | 2 | — | — | — | 0 | 1 of 1 |
| FTNT | 2 | — | — | — | 0 | — |
Per-name counts are small; no percentage on one name is a measure of skill.
Latest calls
| Date | Ticker | Rating | Action | Price at call | Target | Target status | Move in the 30 days before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-29 | KLAC | Neutral | maintained | $166.42 | $190 | running to 2027-10-29 | -15.3% |
| 2026-10-29 | GEV | Positive | maintained | $890.12 | $1250 | running to 2027-10-29 | -7.5% |
| 2026-10-29 | NXT | Positive | maintained | $80.73 | $145 | running to 2027-10-29 | +1.8% |
| 2026-10-29 | GOOGL | Positive | maintained | $282.94 | $400 | running to 2027-10-29 | -17.0% |
| 2026-10-28 | AMD | Positive | maintained | $578.44 | $650 | running to 2027-10-28 | -4.8% |
| 2026-10-28 | ENPH | Neutral | maintained | $24.99 | $26 | within 5% of price when set | -19.1% |
| 2026-10-28 | BA | Positive | maintained | $167.14 | $250 | running to 2027-10-28 | -9.4% |
| 2026-10-26 | V | Positive | maintained | $404.16 | $480 | running to 2027-10-26 | +10.0% |
| 2026-10-22 | META | Positive | maintained | $648.85 | $850 | running to 2027-10-22 | -11.9% |
| 2026-10-21 | AMD | Positive | maintained | $552.72 | $620 | replaced 2026-10-28, new $650 | -10.2% |
Other firms: Barclays · Wells Fargo · Morgan Stanley · UBS · Citigroup · RBC Capital · JPMorgan · Truist Securities · TD Cowen · Cantor Fitzgerald · Evercore ISI Group · Piper Sandler. All firms.
How calls are checked
Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →
Get the daily brief
Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.