Scorecard › Firms › Oppenheimer

Oppenheimer — sell-side record

Oppenheimer made 105 rating actions across 37 covered names in the last 12 months, 92% of them Buy-type and 2% Sell-type. Of its 174 price targets that resolved, 56 (32%) were reached while they stood, 117 were replaced by Oppenheimer before their deadline and 1 fell short at it. 18 of its 32 Buy- and Sell-type ratings that ran a full horizon agreed with how the stock did against its sector.

47 covered names with a call from Oppenheimer in the last two years, checked through 2026-10-29. Rebuilt every morning.

Targets reached while they stood
32.2% 56 of 174
95% range 26–39%
Replaced by Oppenheimer before the deadline
67.2% 117
Short at the deadline
0.6% 1
Still running
30
Ratings vs sector
18 of 32
95% range 39–72% · no letter
Ratings: Buy / Hold / Sell, 12 mo
92 / 6 / 2%
105 rating actions

What its Holds say: Oppenheimer's 2 Hold-type ratings in the last 12 months carried a median price target +9% from the price on the day; 0% sat below the price. Of its Holds that ran a full horizon, 1 of 6 stayed within 5 points of the sector ETF.

Oppenheimer's own rating definitions are not on file yet. Its calls are checked on the defaults: a 12-month horizon, and the stock's sector SPDR ETF as the benchmark. If Oppenheimer publishes a different horizon or benchmark, the record will be rechecked on those terms.

By name

TickerRating actions, 12 moTargets reachedReplaced earlyShortResolvedRatings vs sector
USB8 0 (0%) 14014 0 of 1
BAC4 2 (17%) 10012 1 of 1
PNC7 0 (0%) 909 1 of 1
AMZN4 4 (44%) 509 1 of 1
NVDA4 0 (0%) 808 1 of 1
PANW5 2 (33%) 406 0 of 1
AVGO3 5 (83%) 106 1 of 1
UNH3 2 (33%) 406 0 of 1
WMT3 2 (33%) 406 1 of 1
SHOP1 2 (33%) 406 1 of 1
NFLX6 0 (0%) 505 0 of 1
MSFT5 0 (0%) 505 0 of 1
NET3 3 (60%) 205 0 of 1
V2 1 (20%) 405 1 of 1
ZS2 3 (60%) 205 0 of 1
LRCX1 3 (60%) 205 1 of 1
CME0 2 (40%) 305 1 of 1
ENPH4 1 (25%) 304 0 of 1
BSX3 0 (0%) 404 0 of 1
COST3 1 (25%) 304 0 of 1
FLUT2 1 (25%) 304 0 of 1
REGN1 0 (0%) 404 0 of 1
ROK1 2 (50%) 204 1 of 1
GILD0 2 (50%) 204 1 of 1
GOOGL0 2 (50%) 204 1 of 1
ORCL4 2 (100%) 002 —
GEV3 2 (100%) 002 —
SPCX3 1 (50%) 102 —
ABT2 1 (50%) 102 —
VRTX2 0 (0%) 112 —
GS1 1 (50%) 102 —
RUN1 1 (50%) 102 1 of 1
SYM0 2 (100%) 002 1 of 1
TLN0 2 (100%) 002 1 of 1
AMGN2 0 (0%) 101 —
HD2 0 (0%) 101 —
PLTR2 1 (100%) 001 —
DKNG1 0 (0%) 101 0 of 1
AAPL0 1 (100%) 001 —
JPM0 1 (100%) 001 —
MA0 1 (100%) 001 0 of 1
KLAC3 — ——0 1 of 1
CRWD2 — ——0 1 of 1
ISRG1 — ——0 —
MS1 — ——0 —
ASTS0 — ——0 —
FSLR0 — ——0 —

Per-name counts are small; no percentage on one name is a measure of skill.

Latest calls

DateTickerRatingActionPrice at callTargetTarget statusMove in the 30 days before
2026-10-29 MSFT Outperform reiterated $528.80 $625 running to 2027-10-29 +3.9%
2026-10-29 PLTR Outperform reiterated $193.34 $235 running to 2027-10-29 +3.4%
2026-10-29 ORCL Outperform reiterated $138.21 $275 running to 2027-10-29 +0.3%
2026-10-28 ENPH Outperform → Perform downgrade $24.99 — no target -19.1%
2026-10-28 V Outperform maintained $400.60 $440 running to 2027-10-28 +8.9%
2026-10-26 MSFT Outperform maintained $532.60 $625 running to 2027-10-26 +3.2%
2026-10-23 AMGN Outperform maintained $439.26 $480 running to 2027-10-23 +8.2%
2026-10-23 SHOP Outperform maintained $168.68 $205 running to 2027-10-23 +18.5%
2026-10-21 NFLX Outperform maintained $65.04 $80 running to 2027-10-21 -11.3%
2026-10-16 USB Outperform maintained $58.73 $73 running to 2027-10-16 -1.7%

Other firms: Barclays · Wells Fargo · Morgan Stanley · UBS · Citigroup · RBC Capital · JPMorgan · Truist Securities · TD Cowen · Cantor Fitzgerald · Evercore ISI Group · Piper Sandler. All firms.

How calls are checked

Every call is checked on the firm's own terms. A price target is followed until its own deadline (12 months unless the firm publishes a different horizon) and ends as reached (the stock closed at or beyond it while it stood), replaced (the same firm set a new target first) or short at deadline. A rating is compared with the stock's sector SPDR ETF on total return over the rating's life, because most big-firm ratings are relative: Overweight means "beat its peers", not "go up". Hold-type ratings are tracked, not graded. A firm is numbered only with 30+ resolved targets, and a letter prints only for a firm's whole record where an exact test separates it from a coin flip. None of this is a verdict on anyone's skill, and one day is never a grade. The full method →

Get the daily brief

Our take, the S&P 500 Pulse, the Street's calls and today's docket — one email, weekdays, 9 AM ET, 30 minutes before the open.